Comments on: Big Ben http://www.deepakg.com/blog/2008/08/big-ben/ Preserving Them All - One Keystroke At A Time Wed, 25 Aug 2010 02:25:32 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: lyndap http://www.deepakg.com/blog/2008/08/big-ben/comment-page-1/#comment-948 lyndap Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:01:15 +0000 http://www.deepakg.com/blog/?p=169#comment-948 Great job! Quit complaining; it's by far the most impressive depiction of Big Ben I've been able to find, notwithstanding the machinations necessary to achieve it.<br><br>I was browsing around looking for some good shots to send out for New Year's Eve, from various cities. When searching for London ones, some photos of the clock were very pretty, but this one of yours knocked me out. Instead of sending out several small photos of BB, all on the same page, with various descriptions, I sent yours out, by itself, with no explanation, and it knocked everyone's sox off. I think I got more questions about your Big Ben than I have anything else in a long, long time.<br><br>I hope you continue your very skilled and spectacular work; however, it was just serendipity that I found this <br>one; how/where might I find your future work? Great job! Quit complaining; it's by far the most impressive depiction of Big Ben I've been able to find, notwithstanding the machinations necessary to achieve it.

I was browsing around looking for some good shots to send out for New Year's Eve, from various cities. When searching for London ones, some photos of the clock were very pretty, but this one of yours knocked me out. Instead of sending out several small photos of BB, all on the same page, with various descriptions, I sent yours out, by itself, with no explanation, and it knocked everyone's sox off. I think I got more questions about your Big Ben than I have anything else in a long, long time.

I hope you continue your very skilled and spectacular work; however, it was just serendipity that I found this
one; how/where might I find your future work?

]]> By: deepakg http://www.deepakg.com/blog/2008/08/big-ben/comment-page-1/#comment-42 deepakg Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:21:32 +0000 http://www.deepakg.com/blog/?p=169#comment-42 Oh o. Houston, we have a problem. Actually clicking big-ben again, sorts things out for IE. <br><br>IE7 does not make you a loser honey, but not having FF or Safari does, totally. :) Oh o. Houston, we have a problem. Actually clicking big-ben again, sorts things out for IE.

IE7 does not make you a loser honey, but not having FF or Safari does, totally. :)

]]> By: deepakg http://www.deepakg.com/blog/2008/08/big-ben/comment-page-1/#comment-41 deepakg Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:21:18 +0000 http://www.deepakg.com/blog/?p=169#comment-41 Oh o. Houston, we have a problem. Actually clicking big-ben again, sorts things out for IE. <br><br>IE7 does not make you a loser honey, but not having FF or Safari does, totally. :) Oh o. Houston, we have a problem. Actually clicking big-ben again, sorts things out for IE.

IE7 does not make you a loser honey, but not having FF or Safari does, totally. :)

]]> By: deepakg http://www.deepakg.com/blog/2008/08/big-ben/comment-page-1/#comment-39 deepakg Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:16:45 +0000 http://www.deepakg.com/blog/?p=169#comment-39 LOL NIsh, you've said it, "former" ;-).<br><br>Jokes aside, I had hard feelings about MS stopping work on IE even back in the matrix. The fact is that even if you are being objective, IE looks so bad that people think you're bashing MS.<br><br>Anyway, how is life!? Long time, no hear! LOL NIsh, you've said it, “former” ;-) .

Jokes aside, I had hard feelings about MS stopping work on IE even back in the matrix. The fact is that even if you are being objective, IE looks so bad that people think you're bashing MS.

Anyway, how is life!? Long time, no hear!

]]> By: deepakg http://www.deepakg.com/blog/2008/08/big-ben/comment-page-1/#comment-38 deepakg Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:14:03 +0000 http://www.deepakg.com/blog/?p=169#comment-38 Oh o. Houston, we have a problem. Actually clicking big-ben again, sorts things out for IE. <br><br>IE7 does not make you a loser honey, but not having FF or Safari does, totally. :) Oh o. Houston, we have a problem. Actually clicking big-ben again, sorts things out for IE.

IE7 does not make you a loser honey, but not having FF or Safari does, totally. :)

]]> By: Nish http://www.deepakg.com/blog/2008/08/big-ben/comment-page-1/#comment-37 Nish Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:31:11 +0000 http://www.deepakg.com/blog/?p=169#comment-37 Yeah, the former Msft evangelist has down a total u-turn, hasn't he? :-) Yeah, the former Msft evangelist has down a total u-turn, hasn't he? :-)

]]> By: The Wife http://www.deepakg.com/blog/2008/08/big-ben/comment-page-1/#comment-35 The Wife Thu, 04 Sep 2008 05:35:57 +0000 http://www.deepakg.com/blog/?p=169#comment-35 This counts as one post only. The court's decision is final and binding.<br>Also, once i expand it, it opens expanded in the browser the next time!<br><br>It covers up your scary doll post completely.<br><br>I am on IE7 and that does NOT make me a loser. :( This counts as one post only. The court's decision is final and binding.
Also, once i expand it, it opens expanded in the browser the next time!

It covers up your scary doll post completely.

I am on IE7 and that does NOT make me a loser. :(

]]> By: deepakg http://www.deepakg.com/blog/2008/08/big-ben/comment-page-1/#comment-33 deepakg Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:24:10 +0000 http://www.deepakg.com/blog/?p=169#comment-33 Thanks!<br><br>I did some testing in IE6 and it looks ok. Minor layout issues, but a lot better than what I had imagined! Thanks!

I did some testing in IE6 and it looks ok. Minor layout issues, but a lot better than what I had imagined!

]]> By: Raj http://www.deepakg.com/blog/2008/08/big-ben/comment-page-1/#comment-31 Raj Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:04:54 +0000 http://www.deepakg.com/blog/?p=169#comment-31 IE 7 renders just ok. IE 7 renders just ok.

]]> By: deepakg http://www.deepakg.com/blog/2008/08/big-ben/comment-page-1/#comment-30 deepakg Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:53:27 +0000 http://www.deepakg.com/blog/?p=169#comment-30 Oh yes.. the news readers don't like special mark-up and javascript. Unfortunately they do pick-up CSS. So in google reader you get a huge image overlaid with black text that you can barely read :( Oh yes.. the news readers don't like special mark-up and javascript. Unfortunately they do pick-up CSS. So in google reader you get a huge image overlaid with black text that you can barely read :(

]]>